What is Verbal Plenary Preservation?

from the old testament

• Verbal Plenary Preservation claims that God not only inspired every word of Scripture, but also specifically preserved those exact words in a particular textual form. The Hebrew Scriptures, in fact, affirm that God’s words endure. Isaiah wrote, “The grass withers, the flower fades, but the word of our God will stand forever” (Isaiah 40:8). The psalmist also said God’s word “is firmly fixed in the heavens” (Psalm 119:89). These promises demonstrate divine preservation, yet they do not specify a single printed edition as the uniquely preserved form of the Old Testament.
• Rather, preservation has historically come through ordinary means. Centuries of careful copying produced the Masoretic tradition, and discoveries like the Dead Sea Scrolls show remarkable accuracy over time, with occasional differences that invite careful study. Scripture celebrates that God preserves His words, but it does not instruct readers to treat one later printed edition as the exclusive authority.
• Translation choices in the King James Version sometimes reflect the Hebrew knowledge and English usage as they were understood in the seventeenth century. This means that there are times when it makes errors in its translation into English. For example, the KJV renders the Hebrew re’em as “unicorn” in places like Numbers 23:22, although the term more accurately refers to a wild ox. Modern translations better reflect lexical data and archaeological insights, demonstrating how language study enhances clarity over time. While the preserved Hebrew text remains the foundation, our understanding of rare words has expanded.
• Another example is Genesis 1:28. The KJV reads “replenish the earth,” but in modern English, the word “replenish” implies refilling a previously full world; whereas, God meant what we understand by the word “fill.” That’s why the ESV translates it as, “fill the earth and subdue it” (Genesis 1:28). This illustrates how words can change their meanings over time and require updated wording to convey the same message to contemporary English speakers.
• Shifts in English usage influence understanding across many verses. For example, the KJV uses “corn” in Genesis 42:2 to describe what Jacob’s sons were to buy in Egypt; however, in seventeenth-century English, “corn” referred to grain in general, rather than a specific crop, as it does today. In another example, KJV's Psalm 66:3 says, “How terrible art thou in thy works,” but “terrible” then meant “awe-inspiring,” not frightening or evil. In yet another example, Psalm 119:147 reads, “I prevented the dawning of the morning,” where “prevent” originally meant “to come before,” not “to stop.” These words made perfect sense to earlier readers but can easily mislead modern readers. Because God’s Word is meant to be understood, translations that update vocabulary help the preserved Hebrew meaning come through clearly to today’s readers.

from the new testament

• The claim that God preserved the exact inspired words in the Textus Receptus (TR) centers the promise of preservation on a single printed Greek edition. Jesus said, “Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will not pass away” (Matthew 24:35). That promise guarantees the permanence of Christ’s teachings. Still, it does not specify a later editorial version as uniquely preserved. The New Testament witness itself points us to God’s enduring words, not to one seventeenth-century edition.
• Several well-known TR readings probably reflect later additions that the KJV translated. For example, in 1 John 5:7–8, the ESV states, “For there are three that testify: the Spirit and the water and the blood; and these three agree.” The KJV includes the Trinitarian phrase “in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.” This wording entered the TR from late Latin manuscripts, rather than early Greek ones, illustrating how textual changes influenced the KJV over time.
• Another example is seen in 1 Timothy 3:16. The earliest manuscripts say, “He was manifested in the flesh,” while the TR reads, “God was manifest in the flesh.” The difference arose from a Greek pronoun being misread as “God” after a minor ink stroke was added to a letter. Both affirm Christ’s saving work, but the change illustrates how minor scribal differences influenced the Textus Receptus.
• The TR also includes readings without Greek support. In Revelation 16:5, the KJV states: “Thou art righteous, O Lord, which art, and wast, and shalt be." Modern translations, based on the best Greek evidence, read: “Just are you, O Holy One, who is and who was." The phrase “and shalt be” was added by Theodore Beza and lacks Greek manuscript support. Similarly, in Revelation 22:19, the KJV states: “And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life.” Most early witnesses instead say, “God will take away his share in the tree of life." Even more striking, when Erasmus prepared his first edition, his Greek manuscript of Revelation was missing the final six verses (22:16–21). To fill in the gap, he translated them back from Latin into Greek, creating the unusual readings that entered the TR and remain in the KJV.
• Other familiar differences also show how the TR falls behind earlier and broader evidence. Acts 8:37 and John 5:3b–4 appear in the KJV but are missing from the earliest Greek manuscripts and are usually placed in modern footnotes. The longer ending of Mark (16:9–20) and the story of the woman caught in adultery (John 7:53–8:11) are still included in most Bibles, but they are marked with notes because their earliest manuscript support is weak. These passages demonstrate that the KJV does not rely on the latest discovered or most accurate Greek evidence.
• Finally, the natural changes to language that occur over time reduce the accessibility of the KJV’s New Testament. Words like “let” in 2 Thessalonians 2:7 meant “restrain,” not “permit”; “conversation” in Philippians 1:27 meant “conduct,” not “talking”; and “quit you like men” in 1 Corinthians 16:13 means “act like men, be courageous.” Phrases such as “by and by” (Luke 21:9) once meant “immediately,” but now mean the opposite. These shifts remind us that while God’s Word endures, translations must be updated to speak in clear, living language so that every generation can understand His message.

implications for today

You don’t need to be an expert in manuscripts or languages to trust your Bible. God has preserved His Word through ordinary means—faithful copyists, translators, and printers—so that His message can be read and believed across generations and cultures. Your confidence rests not on a single printed edition or one English translation, but on God’s providence in preserving His Word through a wide range of witnesses.

If you love the King James Version, give thanks for its beauty and the way God used it in history. If you use a modern translation, give thanks for the abundance of early manuscripts that allow for greater accuracy today. Either way, you can read with confidence, knowing that the differences do not alter the truth of the gospel.

So, choose a faithful translation you can understand and read it often. Listen attentively when it is read in church, share it with others, and let it lead you to Christ. God has preserved His Word so that His people can hear His voice clearly and follow Him with confidence.