Is Jesus a myth?

featured article image

TL;DR:

Jesus is not a myth; He was a real historical figure documented by eyewitnesses, early manuscripts, and secular sources. Jesus’ life, death, and resurrection are supported by historical evidence, showing He is real and that all who trust in Him can be saved.

from the old testament

  • The Old Testament foreshadows and prophecies of a coming Messiah that were fulfilled in Jesus. In Genesis 3:15, God promises that the seed of the woman would crush the serpent—a reference Christians interpret as the coming of Jesus.
  • Passages like Isaiah 7:14 (“Behold, the virgin shall conceive and bear a son…”) and Micah 5:2 (predicting the Messiah’s birth in Bethlehem) point to a real future person, not a myth.
  • Figures like Moses, David, and the sacrificial system point forward to a real, historical Savior who would fulfill God’s plan.

from the new testament

  • The New Testament contains four Gospel accounts of Jesus’ life. Two of these, Matthew and John, were written by men who were disciples of Jesus, while Mark was recorded by a man who served closely with the apostle Peter, according to early church history.
  • The fourth Gospel writer, Luke, claims to have written his gospel as the result of compiling the evidence from his time among eyewitnesses and other written records and was published most likely in the 60s AD, approximately thirty years from the time of the actual events. His prologue in Luke 1:1-4 reads: “Inasmuch as many have undertaken to compile a narrative of the things that have been accomplished among us, just as those who from the beginning were eyewitnesses and ministers of the word have delivered them to us, it seemed good to me also, having followed all things closely for some time past, to write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus, that you may have certainty concerning the things you have been taught” (Emphasis added).
  • The apostle John designated those who deny Jesus’ existence as having “the spirit of the antichrist” (1 John 4:2-3).

implications for today

Robert Price, author of Deconstructing Jesus and a member of the controversial Jesus Seminar, has been an outspoken apologist for the mythical Jesus. In his words, "We will never know whether Jesus existed unless someone discovers his diary or skeleton." But this is not the whole story. Many lines of evidence beyond a personal journal or corpse are typically used to verify historical accounts. Historical and archaeological evidence reveals significant evidence that coincides with the Bible’s accounts concerning the life of Jesus of Nazareth.

Along with the New Testament accounts of Jesus, external evidence also shows that approximately 5,800 handwritten Greek manuscripts exist (Greek was the original language of the New Testament), offering significantly more early copies than any other ancient work. In comparison, The Iliad by Homer, one of the greatest works of ancient literature, stands in second place with just 643 ancient manuscripts.

In addition, there is a high degree of accuracy among these thousands of early manuscripts. Researchers note that as much as 99.5% of the New Testament is accurately preserved.

The next question to consider is whether this early information from the New Testament is accurate. A wide variety of secular sources confirm many details mentioned in the New Testament. These writers include Josephus, Tacitus, Lucian, Thallus, Suetonius, Pliny the Younger, and the Jewish Talmud, among others. The late New Testament scholar F.F. Bruce notes the following summary of events verified in extra-biblical documents in his work Jesus & Jewish Origins Outside the New Testament:

• Jesus lived during the time of Tiberius and Caesar.

• He lived a virtuous life.

• He was a wonder-worker.

• He had a brother named James.

• He was acclaimed to be the Messiah.

• He was crucified under Pontius Pilate.

• An eclipse and earthquake occurred when He died.

• He was crucified on the eve of the Jewish Passover.

• His disciples believed He rose from the dead.

• His disciples were willing to die for their belief.

• Christianity spread rapidly as far as Rome.

• His disciples denied the Roman gods and worshiped Jesus as God.

In fact, New Testament scholar Gary Habermas notes, "Altogether, there are even about a dozen and a half non-Christian sources that mention Jesus within the first 150 years after his death." A full list and discussion of these sources are available in his book The Historical Jesus.

Archaeology provides even additional strength regarding the New Testament's accuracy. As noted in When Skeptics Ask by Norman Geisler and Ronald Brooks, many inscriptions and locations from the Gospel accounts have been discovered, including references to Pilate, the man who condemned Jesus to death; Bethlehem, the city of Jesus' birth; Nazareth, the city where Jesus was raised; and the home of Pilate in Jerusalem.

But is there any way in which the information we have been given in the New Testament about Jesus is the result of pagan religious influences? Again, the accusation does not fit the facts. Two compelling reasons support this. To begin, the first pagan religion to include a resurrection account that we know of did not exist until the second century. As such, the pagan religious connections alleged to serve as the basis for the life and works of Jesus came after Jesus and the writing of the gospel accounts.

Second, even if it could be proven that these pagan accounts existed before the earthly life of Jesus (and that cannot be proven), these similarities would not necessarily mean they were borrowed or copied. The only way this could be proven would be to provide examples of specific connections that show the New Testament writers used specific pagan religious records in their narratives of the life of Jesus, something that cannot be shown based on existing evidence.

All of these historical facts make a strong case that the Jesus of the New Testament lived, came to popularity during the time of Herod, was put to death on a Roman cross under the authority of Pilate, and that His followers taught that Jesus was alive again, quickly resulting in the spread of Christianity across the Roman Empire.

As for finding the corpse of Jesus, if the message of Scripture is true, then it would never be found to provide 100% DNA evidence because Jesus is alive, not dead. This is not a myth, but a miracle, and one that proves Jesus was the Messiah, the risen Son of God.

understand

  • Jesus was a real historical figure, documented by eyewitnesses and early manuscripts.
  • Old Testament prophecies and New Testament writings point to Jesus as a true person, not a myth.
  • Secular and archaeological evidence confirms Jesus’ life, death, and resurrection.

reflect

  • How does knowing that Jesus was a real historical figure strengthen your trust in His teachings and promises?
  • How does the historical evidence of Jesus’ life and resurrection challenge doubts you may have about your faith?
  • How can you live with confidence in Jesus’ reality and the truth of His message?

engage

  • How do the Old Testament prophecies and the New Testament writings of Jesus shape our understanding of Him as more than a myth?
  • What impact does secular and archaeological evidence have on how we explain Jesus’ historicity and existence to skeptics?
  • How should the historical reality of Jesus influence the way we share the gospel in a world that questions His existence?