print donate

What is the Synoptic Problem?

What is the Synoptic Problem?
Redemption The Bible Studying the Bible

TL;DR:

The Synoptic Problem questions why Matthew, Mark, and Luke often describe the same events with similar wording and order, yet with differences. The best explanation is shared eyewitness testimony and the common use of available sources, all guided by the Holy Spirit.

what does the bible say?

Matthew, Mark, and Luke share similar content and style, so they are therefore called the Synoptic Gospels. The term "synoptic" means “a common view.” The many similarities between them have led some to wonder if they had a shared source, such as another written account, often called “Q” among scholars. No such document has ever been discovered, and there is little need to propose one. For example, Luke specifically states he learned from others (Luke 1:1–4), indicating he based his account on other sources and eyewitnesses that could also have been used by the other two writers. Additionally, it is possible that one Gospel, like Mark, was written first and served as a source for Matthew and Luke.

Whether or not the Synoptic writers borrowed from similar sources or even from each other, all of Scripture is God-breathed (2 Timothy 3:16). That means the Holy Spirit inspired them all (2 Peter 1:21), so they are without error. Since they are all true, it’s no surprise to find the same accounts in multiple documents. Also, while there are similarities, they are far from being copies of each other. Each has a different purpose and focus. So, the Synoptics are eyewitness accounts from the same time in history about the same events, inspired by the same Holy Spirit. Therefore, it’s no surprise or problem that they share similarities.

from the old testament

  • The Synoptics are the New Testament books of Matthew, Mark, and Luke.

from the new testament

  • The Synoptic Problem refers to the similarities among Matthew, Mark, and Luke, which often record the same events with similar wording. It is called a “problem” because it raises questions about the originality of content and what sources may have been used. In academic settings, this is often approached with the assumption that Scripture came about only through ordinary human processes, which can lead to viewing the Gospels as evolving traditions, rather than Spirit-inspired testimony.
  • Scripture itself, however, presents a very different picture. Paul wrote that “All Scripture is breathed out by God” (2 Timothy 3:16), and Peter explained that “no prophecy was ever produced by the will of man, but men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit” (2 Peter 1:21). Jesus also promised that the Spirit would bring His words to the apostles’ remembrance, allowing them to teach and record what happened accurately (John 14:26). This means that while the Gospel writers may have used sources or shared accounts, their writings are ultimately the product of divine inspiration and are therefore trustworthy and without error.
  • Luke himself provides the clearest insight into the process of using original sources. He wrote that he carefully investigated everything, drawing from earlier accounts and the testimony of eyewitnesses so that his Gospel would be an orderly and trustworthy record (Luke 1:1–4). This demonstrates that God used ordinary means—research, memory, and sources—while ensuring accuracy through the Spirit’s work.
  • Many scholars suggest that Mark was written first and that Matthew and Luke used it, along with other eyewitness accounts, in their own writings. While it's impossible to definitively prove Mark was written first, it remains a possibility. Nonetheless, such reliance does not diminish the inspiration of Matthew and Luke but instead shows the Spirit guiding their use of credible material already circulating in the early church (cf., 1 Corinthians 15:3–5).
  • Notably, the Synoptics are not three exact copies. Instead, despite their similarities, they are three unique portraits of Christ. Matthew emphasizes the fulfillment of prophecy, Mark highlights action and gospel urgency, and Luke underscores historical certainty through eyewitness accounts. Therefore, while there is some overlap, together they offer a more complete picture of Jesus’s time on earth than any single Gospel can provide.

implications for today

The Synoptics might be unique in being the only set of three biblical books all covering the same events, but they are not unique in how they should be read. Every part of the Bible demands careful, faith-filled reading. To understand a passage, start with the immediate context to grasp its meaning, then consider how it fits within the entire book and the broader storyline of Scripture. Let clearer passages explain those that are less clear, and stay focused on the main truths God highlights. This approach prevents confusion and helps you see the unity of God’s Word.

As you read, approach Scripture with prayer and humility, asking the Lord for understanding and a willingness to obey. Read patiently, knowing that not every question has an immediate answer, and remember that God has already provided everything needed for life and godliness. Above all, let your study bring you closer to Christ, who is the focus of the entire Bible. Whether you're in Matthew, Mark, Luke, or any other book, the goal is not just to analyze words, but to know Him, trust Him, and follow Him with confidence and joy.

understand

  • Matthew, Mark, and Luke share content and structure, making them “Synoptic Gospels,” but each has a unique focus and purpose.
  • Similarities among the Gospels may result from shared sources, eyewitness accounts, or one Gospel influencing another.
  • Similarities among the Gospels do not compromise divine inspiration.

reflect

  • How does knowing the Synoptic Gospels are Spirit-inspired affect your confidence in them?
  • When reading parallel passages, how can you appreciate each Gospel’s unique emphasis without seeing contradictions?
  • How might studying the Synoptics together deepen your understanding of Jesus’ life and teachings?

engage

  • What are the different emphases of Matthew, Mark, and Luke, and how do they complement each other in telling the story of Christ?
  • What can the use of shared sources teach us about God’s providence in preserving His Word?
  • How does recognizing eyewitness accounts in the Gospels strengthen your faith in the historical reliability of Scripture?

More Resources

Apologetics The Q Gospel – What is it? If there was a Q Gospel would that make the Synoptic Gospels less valid?

The Q Gospel – What is it? If there was a Q Gospel would that make the Synoptic Gospels less valid?

The Q Gospel is a hypothetical document alleged to have been used by the authors of Matthew and Luke as a source of information. However, there is no proof that the Q Gospel existed.
Studying the Bible When were the Gospels written?

When were the Gospels written?

Although the date of authorship of the Gospels is not specifically recorded, they were written after the events occurred to record all Jesus did and said so that we would know Him and believe in Him.
Studying the Bible Why are there four Gospels instead of one?

Why are there four Gospels instead of one?

The four Gospels provide complementary, but distinct, perspectives on the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus. Together, the four Gospels offer a fuller picture than a single account could.
Apologetics Has the Bible been corrupted, changed, or tampered with?

Has the Bible been corrupted, changed, or tampered with?

The Bible we read today is remarkably faithful to the original manuscripts, with 99% accuracy confirmed by historical evidence and discoveries like the Dead Sea Scrolls. Minor differences exist but don’t affect core Christian doctrines, proving that the Bible has not been corrupted or tampered with over time.