Have Christians corrupted the Bible?

featured article image

TL;DR:

Despite the claims, there is no evidence that Christians have corrupted the Bible. The textual evidence supports the authenticity and integrity of the Bible's message.

from the old testament

  • The Bible tells us that God’s Word is true and proves true; it hasn’t been changed to meet an agenda. "Every word of God proves true; he is a shield to those who take refuge in him" (Proverbs 30:5).
  • God warns us about those who try to add to God’s Word (Deuteronomy 4:2).
  • Proverbs 30:6 says something similar about not adding to God’s Word: "Do not add to his words, lest he rebuke you and you be found a liar."

from the new testament

  • The New Testament confirms that the Bible is God’s Word: "All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness" (2 Timothy 3:16).
  • The Bible warns us of consequences if we add words or take away words (Revelation 22:18-19).

implications for today

Muslims often use this argument that Christians have corrupted the Bible in attempts to disprove Christianity. This allegation has no credible evidence. The Qur'an itself praises the Bible (Surah 3:3) and encourages Muslims to ask Christians and Jews about its contents if they are in doubt (Surah 10:94), indicating a positive view of the Bible's reliability. Aside from grammar and spelling variation, the Bible today is essentially the same Bible that Muhammad praised (Surah 3:3). The Qur’an also says that God’s Word cannot be changed (Surah 6:34; 10:34, 64), and it makes no distinction between the various revelations of God (Surah 2:136). The New Testament was completed 500 years before Muhammad received the Qur’an, so any claim of biblical corruption requires clear evidence, as the burden of proof lies with the newer text, not the older one.

Newer, more modern religions, such as Mormonism and Jehovah’s Witnesses, have attempted to disqualify the Scripture as being corrupted, thereby ushering in their newer, “corrected” versions of the Bible. They have no basis for doing this since the Scriptures have not changed since being established during the early church era.

To clarify, the canon of the Old and New Testaments was not created by church councils to push a religious agenda. Rather, these councils affirmed what was already accepted as Scripture by God’s people based on specific criteria: confirmed and authoritative authorship, consistent content with established doctrine, widespread use in worship, and clear evidence of divine inspiration. The Old Testament canon was established well before the time of Christ, affirmed by Jesus Himself (Luke 24:44), and preserved faithfully by Jewish scribes. The New Testament canon was functionally closed by the end of the 4th century A.D., though the writings themselves were completed in the 1st century A.D. Church councils, such as those at Hippo (393 AD) and Carthage (397 AD), did not invent the canon but formally affirmed the books already widely used and trusted across the early church. These councils responded to heresies and forgeries, not to reshape doctrines, but to preserve the true teachings handed down from Christ and the apostles. The process of the canon shows that Christians did not corrupt the Bible but faithfully preserve the writings God had inspired.

understand

  • The Bible has been faithfully preserved, not changed.
  • The canon was recognized, not created.
  • Even the Qur’an affirms the Bible’s reliability.

reflect

  • What evidence strengthens or challenges your confidence in the reliability of the Bible?
  • How does the reliability of the Bible not being corrupted spur you on in your walk of faith?
  • What does it mean for your daily life that God has preserved His Word without corruption?

engage

  • How can we respond to arguments that the Bible is corrupted respectfully and truthfully?
  • How do the manuscript evidence and historical church councils actually support the Bible’s trustworthiness rather than undermine it?
  • How does the Quran's view of the Bible open doors for meaningful conversations with Muslims about the reliability of Scripture?