What does the God-of-the-gaps argument propose?

Quick answer

The God-of-the-gaps argument proposes that people invoke “god” only to explain what science cannot yet explain. The Bible, however, says that God is the Creator and Sustainer of all things, not just those things we do not yet understand.

WHAT DOES THE BIBLE SAY?

The “God-of-the-gaps” argument is often used to discredit belief in God by claiming that He is merely a stand-in for human ignorance. As science advances, these “gaps” supposedly shrink, leaving less and less room for God. But the God of the Bible is not limited to mysteries—He is Lord over both the known and the unknown. Scripture never presents God as a last resort explanation. Instead, He is the Origin, Sustainer, and end of all things. The Bible affirms natural processes, yet insists they are governed by God’s providential hand.

Additionally, God invites investigation, not blind superstition. He commands His people to meditate on His works and praises those who grow in wisdom from them. The issue is not whether we can understand how something works—but whether we acknowledge who gave it its order and purpose.

Faith in God is not threatened by scientific discovery. Rather, science reveals the consistency, creativity, and beauty of God’s handiwork. The God-of-the-gaps defenders worry that we are over-attributing to God. However, the danger is the opposite: we are reducing Him to a mere explanation for what we have not yet figured out.

FROM THE OLD TESTAMENT

FROM THE NEW TESTAMENT

IMPLICATIONS FOR TODAY

The God-of-the-gaps argument misrepresents biblical faith. It imagines that believers insert God only where they lack "real" explanations. But biblical Christianity teaches that God is not just the answer to mysteries—He is the foundation of all reality. He made what we do not understand, and He also made what we do understand. He upholds what we don’t understand, and He upholds what we do.

This means that we should never be afraid of scientific discovery. The more we learn about creation, the more we see the intricacy, consistency, and wisdom of the One who designed it. True science does not erase God—it reveals the depth of His handiwork.

However, while we can pursue scientific endeavors, we should not confuse the scientific method with “philosophical naturalism.” The former is a tool that helps us to probe deeply into God’s creation. The latter is a worldview that denies God exists even before it starts to probe. Christians should embrace scientific inquiry while rejecting assumptions that everything is explainable without God. Rather, we must start with the assumption that things exist because God exists.

That leads us to faith. Our faith should not be grounded in what science says or concludes about creation. Instead, we must ground it in what God has said, even when it contradicts science. That is because God is not only the source of creation but also the only source of infallible wisdom.

In the end, the problem with the God-of-the-gaps view is theological. It shrinks God down to a mere placeholder that fills in the gaps until we know the “real” answer. The God of Scripture is not a placeholder. He is the source of all and the Lord of all.

UNDERSTAND

REFLECT

ENGAGE