Part of the gap theory is the idea of Lucifer's flood, also called the Luciferian flood. Lucifer’s flood followed a time when Satan ruled the earth, which was populated by soulless men. During this time, say gap theorists, the rebellion of Satan occurred, and God punished him by bringing a flood. This theory states that the fossil records come from the millions of years before this flood, and the six-day creation happened afterward, when the earth was "without form and void." The Bible provides a clear and cohesive narrative of creation in Genesis. Genesis 1:1–2 describes God’s creation of the heavens and the earth, and the six-day creation sequence follows without reference to gaps or pre-Adamic events. Death and sin are directly tied to the fall of Adam and Eve (Romans 5:12), making the idea of death occurring before humanity biblically untenable. Faith requires trusting in God’s Word over speculative theories (Hebrews 11:1).
Lucifer's flood and the gap theory are pure speculation. If we believe the Bible to be literally true, it is unsupportable to simply insert things, like Lucifer's flood or the millions of years in the "gap," for the purpose of making sense of scientific theories and geological discoveries. The fact is those discoveries are not explained in the Scripture.
Gap theory and the Lucifer's flood theory depend on a lot of speculation. They are an attempt to explain and understand why the Bible and the scientific record do not agree in terms of the age of the earth. We do not know the answer to this. Maybe, someday, we will. It may be difficult for us to trust God in places where the Bible is silent, but it is not a good idea to come up with theories based entirely on speculation that have no basis either scientifically or biblically.
The idea of Lucifer’s flood arises from a desire to reconcile Scripture with modern scientific theories, such as the fossil record or geological timelines. However, Christians must resist the temptation to insert speculative events into Scripture to align it with external evidence. Instead, we should approach these disagreements with humility, acknowledging that some answers remain beyond human understanding—at least until more evidence is discovered. Faith requires trust. Even science requires faith. But when science presents supposedly conflicting claims, we must seek the truth, knowing that it will align with God’s Word. The emphasis should remain on the clarity of Scripture, seeking the truth, and holding on to the centrality of the gospel message.